Follow us twitter facebook
Edition: Global
Click here to subscribe toour free weekly newsletter click here
Laws and regulations

British advertising watchdog bans two digitally retouched ads

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned two L’Oréal cosmetics ads featuring, following complaints by a Member of the Parliament that they had been digitally manipulated. A Help Note, recently issued by the Committee of Advertising Practice, was supposed to help advertisers avoiding this kind of problems.

It is the first decision of this kind after the British bodies regulating advertising practices have published a new advertising guidance that aimed to bring greater clarity about digital retouching for the cosmetics sector. The prohibition follows a complaint by Liberal Democrat MP Jo Swinson that the ads were misleading, because of digital alterations and concerns a two-page magazine ad for the Teint Miracle foundation by Lancôme, featuring an image of actress Julia Roberts, and a magazine ad for The Eraser foundation by Maybelline, featuring an image of top-model Christy Turlington.

800_JRoberts

800_JRoberts

In both cases, L’Oréal admitted to the ASA that “post-production techniques” had been used, but claimed the images accurately illustrated the results the products could achieve. The cosmetics firm provided details on how the photographs were digitally retouched. In the Lancôme case L’Oréal even provided before and after laboratory pictures of testers wearing the foundation.

Nevertheless, the ASA deemed that the information provided by the company did not enabled it to conclude that the ad images accurately illustrated what effect the products were capable to achieve. By prohibiting the ads from further appearance, the British watchdog implied the digital postproduction techniques used might have exaggerated the results of the products.

A few months ago the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP) issued a Help Note on ’The use of production techniques in cosmetics advertising’. This document is supposed to clarify under which circumstances pre and post production techniques are admissible, or not, in cosmetic ads. The Help Note gives examples of production techniques that, depending on their use, are likely to mislead and those that are not. The text allows “minor adjustments to correct for lighting problems and other photographic issues.” Apparently the ASA has opted for a stringent interpretation of the document.

Vincent Gallon

© 2011 - Premium Beauty News - www.premiumbeautynews.com
latest news
Focus
The award for the best packaging solution was given to Qualipac - part of the Pochet Group

Qualipac and Verescence winners of the Luxe Pack in Green Awards Monaco 2018

On the occasion of the 31st edition of Luxe Pack Monaco, the Luxe Pack in Green awards jury deliberated to designate the 2018 winners. Every year the most environmentally friendly packaging solutions and corporate social responsibility initiatives receive recognition. Qualipac wins the award in the Packaging Solutions category The (...)

read more
job opportunities
Experts’ views
Replexium™ - Rapid improvement in visible signs of skin aging

Torsten Clarius
Replexium™ - Rapid improvement in visible signs of skin aging

With life expectancy increasing, the global market for skincare products that contribute to a youthful, vibrant appearance is growing dynamically. It comes as no surprise that fast-acting anti-aging actives are in great demand, yet breakthroughs have remained few and far between. Now BASF has achieved a new milestone with Replexium™, (...)

read more

Features

We use cookies to give you a better browsing experience. By continuing your visit to this site, you accept the use of cookies. Read more and set cookies
close